FTC and access to information

Gaining access to basic consumer information seems to have more hurdles than one would expect.
A few months ago I approached the Fair Trading Commission (FTC) and asked them for a copy of the Terms of Reference (TOR) of the consultants assessing the Price Cap. I also asked for the dates for their work.
I wasn’t asking for what they were paying the consultants from taxpayer revenue to tell us some things we could determine for ourselves. I felt that as a taxpayer I was entitled to know what they were supposed to be doing so I could enhance any submission on the Price Cap, which affects the pockets of the most vulnerable in our society.
It seemed quite reasonable. The response was that both items of information requested were “internal” and not available to the public.
Well, in August I enquired about the number of people who have been waiting for basic telephone service and the date of the last report.
Surprise! This is also not public information.
Well, what is surprising is that we live in a world where all administrations, including the new Government, talk about transparency and good governance.
But without access to basic information consumers cannot advocate on matters that affect their interests.
So to deny consumers elementary information is tantamount to failing to perform a fundamental public responsibility, that of transparency in public office.

Hallam Hope

Fatal dose of Medicine

For those of you who put so much medical faith in Western Medicine I invite you to take a look at this. For those of you who have suffered or had family or friends that died, you have survived to tell the tale so tell it. The only health security you have is to avoid everything European and American.

Please click on this link: Fatal Dose

More Consumer Protection

It was with amusement that I watched Mr. LeHunte on TV tonight trying to talk about market forces driving prices. He is obviously disappointed with the Central Bank's new position to regulate bank charges to their customers.

For too long these charges were at the whim and fancy of the bank. Who is Mr LeHunte fooling that there is any real competition in the banking sector. They have always and continue to do thier own thing individually.

At this time when inflation is a factor, there is within reason, a bar beyond which charges should never go because of the nature of the industry. Banks have thousands of customers and to collect even a cent from its customers is a lot of money. Like the gas stations, a gill from every gallon adds up because of the volume of sales. That is why every gas pump should be calibrated by law.

So Mr. LeHunte, I am sorry, It is about time. Next should be the insurance companies. Imaging charging thirty dollars for a returned cheque and less than a dollar if it don't bounce. That is a penalty and I am one who believe that penalties should be paid into the consolidate fund and not go into the pockets of an unscrupulous banking sector to beef up their profits at the expense of small businesses that can least afford it and who always have cash flow problems. If customers did not write cheques, small businesses would not have a cash flow problem.

Not only that, the way banks operate are like thieves in the night. Incur an expense on you and then proceed to take it out before they notify you. Do not give people a change to budget and pay. They just take and don't care what you had planned, so they have their customers feeling guilty and at thier mercy. This is unfair. No other institution gets away with this and the banks should not.

Furthermore, banks just take and take and take without giving back. Of course you don't give back because you are in it for making money. The token things I have seen the banks involved in seem the least they could do to generate some kind of goodwill; if that is necessary.

NGOs for example do not get anything from banks. They are the last we go to and even some when that is so we don't remember them because they have the reputation of being the stingiest. Tried with them a few times and never got pass the talk. Somebody will always pass you onto somebody else who can make the decision only to find out that somebody else has to make the decision who would never likely to be in at anytime that you visit the bank.

So banks do not have goodwill but we tolerate them so we don't have to put our money under the cellar but they are taking advantage and monopolising the situation.

Digicel and Cable & Wireless

Date: Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 1:09 PM
Subject: Digicel and Cable & Wireless
To: Bdosconsumer@gmail.com

Digicel

I frequently make calls to Guyana from my Digicel prepaid cell phone. On one occasion while making such a call I noticed that the call timer of the cell phone was running while the cell connection was ringing but not answered. This obviously is not normal as the timer should only come on when the call has been answered by the receiving party, thus initiating charges. Since no one answered I hung up and checked my balance which should have been $10 dollars since I had just recharged the phone with the said amount. It was not $10 but $9.12. I made a mental note but did nothing.

However, I started noticing more and more that the same thing was happening so I decided to call Digicel customer care. I was told by a representative that Digicel was experiencing a problem with calls to Guyana and that she on behalf of Digicel was sorry and wanted to know if I wanted a refund. I said no and that all I wanted was for them to fix the problem because I have to make frequent calls to Guyana and I should not be charged for calls that were not connected. The customer representative assured me that they were actively working on the problem and hoped to get it resolved soon.

A week went by and the problem seemed to have been solved. Unfortunately it recommenced, so finally I decided I couldn't take it any more after realizing that I was losing about $20 a month in calls that were never connected. I called Digicel customer care and told the representative that I wanted a refund for the the last call I just made (I estimated the refund to be about 89cents). She told me that I was not going to get a refund because

1) Digicel was not the responsible carrier. It was the Guyanese company that was at fault.
2) I did not know the exact amount of money that was initially on the phone card before I made the call.

In response to this I said that:

1) Digicel was the responsible carrier since I was making the call through them and it was Digicel and not any company in Guyana that was deducting credit from me. They were the ones taking my money!
2) It seems illogical for someone to have to take the time to constantly check the balance of their phone before they initiate a call. How many people do you know that do that? Once you know that you have money on your phone you just dial.

My response fell on death ears and I got no refund....(remember I was asking for less than a dollar). Doesn't Digicel have the technology to see the last call that was made from a cell phone?

With the high Guyanese population in Barbados, the vast exchange between the two countries and the number of people that do not look to see if their money is being deducted for unanswered calls, one can safely estimate that Digicel is getting rich for not even providing a service. Alternatively, getting rich from providing a terrible service. Digicel must be getting rich by just silently nickel & diming persons. Especially Guyanese who might be illegal in Barbados and therefore will not complain.

Please make the general public aware of this.


Cable & Wireless

If you did not know, Cable & Wireless has been traffic shaping and throttling the internet to their customers disadvantage.

See the link below:

http://www.azureuswiki.com/index.php/Bad_ISPs#Barbados

There have been many times recently that I have been downloading legitimate files from the internet from sites like Rapidshare, when suddenly the download connection was severed due to Cable & Wireless over agressive traffic shaping and throttling policy. Thus wasting lots of my time as sometimes these files were transferring for over twenty five minutes.

Our North American neighbours have realised what some ISPs like Cable & Wireless have been doing and have taken successful action:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080711.wgtcomcast0711/BNStory/Technology/?page=rss&id=RTGAM.20080711.wgtcomcast0711

http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1859/125/


Please help save the freedom of the Barbados internet or next we will find that blog sites like yours or the Barbados Underground or the Barbados Free Press are being cut off from the public by an ISP over stepping it's bounds!


Please reply and let me know what you think
A very concern bajan